자유연합- FreedomUnion.net

핫이슈 등 최신정보와 뉴스입니다..
 프린트 하기  한글파일로 저장  메모장으로 저장  워드패드로 저장   
美 합참의장 마크 밀리, "트럼프, 선거 패배 후 이란 폭격 거론"
[수잔 글레이서(Susan B. Glasser)]

“You’re Gonna Have a Fucking War”: Mark Milley’s Fight to Stop Trump from Striking Iran

Inside the extraordinary final-days conflict between the former President and his chairman of the Joint Chiefs.

By Susan B. Glasser
July 15, 2021

In the months after the 2020 election, the subject of Iran was repeatedly raised in White House meetings with Trump, and Mark Milley repeatedly argued against a strike.

The last time that General Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke with President Donald Trump was on January 3, 2021. The subject of the Sunday-afternoon meeting, at the White House, was Iran’s nuclear program. For the past several months, Milley had been engaged in an alarmed effort to insure that Trump did not embark on a military conflict with Iran as part of his quixotic campaign to overturn the results of the 2020 election and remain in power. The chairman secretly feared that Trump would insist on launching a strike on Iranian interests that could set off a full-blown war.

There were two “nightmare scenarios,” Milley told associates, for the period after the November 3rd election, which resulted in Trump’s defeat but not his concession: one was that Trump would try “to use the military on the streets of America to prevent the legitimate, peaceful transfer of power.” The other was an external crisis involving Iran. It was not public at the time, but Milley believed that the nation had come close—“very close”—to conflict with the Islamic Republic. This dangerous post-election period, Milley said, was all because of Trump’s “Hitler”-like embrace of the “Big Lie” that the election had been stolen from him; Milley feared it was Trump’s “Reichstag moment,” in which, like Adolf Hitler in 1933, he would manufacture a crisis in order to swoop in and rescue the nation from it.

To prevent such an outcome, Milley had, since late in 2020, been having morning phone meetings, at 8 A.M. on most days, with the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in the hopes of getting the country safely through to Joe Biden’s Inauguration. The chairman, a burly four-star Army general who had been appointed to the post by Trump in 2019, referred to these meetings with his staff as the “land the plane” calls—as in, “both engines are out, the landing gear are stuck, we’re in an emergency situation. Our job is to land this plane safely and to do a peaceful transfer of power the 20th of January.”

This extraordinary confrontation between the nation’s top military official and the Commander-in-Chief had been building throughout 2020. Before the election, Milley had drafted a plan for how to handle the perilous period leading up to the Inauguration. He outlined four goals: first, to make sure that the U.S. didn’t unnecessarily go to war overseas; second, to make sure that U.S. troops were not used on the streets of America against the American people, for the purpose of keeping Trump in power; third, to maintain the military’s integrity; and, lastly, to maintain his own integrity. He referred back to them often in conversations with others.

As the crisis with Trump unfolded, and the chairman’s worst-case fears about the President not accepting defeat seemed to come true, Milley repeatedly met in private with the Joint Chiefs. He told them to make sure there were no unlawful orders from Trump and not to carry out any such orders without calling him first—almost a conscious echo of the final days of Richard Nixon, when Nixon’s Defense Secretary, James Schlesinger, reportedly warned the military not to act on any orders from the White House to launch a nuclear strike without first checking with him or with the national-security adviser, Henry Kissinger. At one meeting with the Joint Chiefs, in Milley’s Pentagon office, the chairman invoked Benjamin Franklin’s famous line, saying they should all hang together. To concerned members of Congress—including Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—and also emissaries from the incoming Biden Administration, Milley also put out the word: Trump might attempt a coup, but he would fail because he would never succeed in co-opting the American military. “Our loyalty is to the U.S. Constitution,” Milley told them, and “we are not going to be involved in politics.”

This account of a behind-the-scenes struggle over Iran involving Milley and Trump—a secret backdrop to the public drama unleashed by Trump’s unprecedented refusal to accept the Presidential-election results—comes from some of the nearly two hundred interviews, with a variety of sources, that I have conducted along with my husband, the Times reporter Peter Baker, for a book on the Trump Presidency that will be published next year. Some of the other details reported here about Milley’s actions have been disclosed in recent days by the authors of two new books about Trump and 2020—Michael Bender, of the Wall Street Journal, and Philip Rucker and Carol Leonnig, of the Washington Post—and been independently confirmed by me. Milley has not addressed the revelations publicly.

In a statement released on Thursday, reacting to reports about the Rucker and Leonnig book, Trump said, “I never threatened, or spoke about, to anyone, a coup of our Government.” He added, “If I was going to do a coup, one of the last people I would want to do it with is General Mark Milley.” Trump said he selected Milley for the post only because he wanted to spite his then Defense Secretary, Jim Mattis, who, he said, “could not stand him.” “I often act counter to people’s advice who I don’t respect,” Trump noted. The former President posited that Milley, a career military officer, was allowing these accounts to circulate “to curry favor with the Radical Left.”

Milley had been in full-alarm mode since the summer of 2020. On June 1st, Trump had used the general as a prop in his infamous Lafayette Square photo op: Trump had marched through the plaza minutes after it had been violently cleared of peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters, and following him was Defense Secretary Mark Esper, a pack of his White House advisers, and Milley, who was dressed in combat fatigues, as if at war inside America. Milley, an Irish-Catholic from outside Boston who worships the Constitution and the military’s tradition of political neutrality, considered that photo op his “Damascus moment,” as he would later call it: a few short minutes of misjudgment that would haunt him forever. He considered resigning but instead decided to do his penance. “I’ll fight from the inside,” he told his staff. The following week, during a previously scheduled commencement address, he apologized publicly for taking part in a political display that was completely inappropriate for the leader of America’s apolitical armed forces.

On June 3rd, in the Pentagon briefing room, Esper announced that he was opposed to invoking the Insurrection Act against protesters and said that he tried to remain apolitical in his job. Soon after Esper’s statement to the press, Esper, Milley, and the CENTCOM commander, Frank Mackenzie, were scheduled to attend a White House meeting on Afghanistan. Trump, enraged, lit into Esper before Milley could even sit down. The President went “apeshit” on Esper, Milley told associates, one of the worst such reamings-out he had ever seen. Trump would go on to fire Esper days after he lost the 2020 election. Milley told his aides that he, too, was prepared to be fired, or even court-martialled. In another meeting after Milley’s speech, Trump, sitting at his desk in the Oval Office, demanded to know why Milley had apologized; apologies, Trump told him, according to an account that Milley later repeated, are a sign of weakness. “Not where I come from,” Milley replied, as he later told associates. Milley said he had to ask for forgiveness because he was a soldier in uniform who did not belong at a political event. “I don’t expect you to understand,” Milley had said. “It’s an ethic for us, a duty.” (In his statement on Thursday, Trump referenced his anger at Milley’s apology. “I saw at that moment he had no courage or skill, certainly not the type of person I would be talking ‘coup’ with. I’m not into coups!”)

A running concern for Milley was the prospect of Trump pushing the nation into a military conflict with Iran. He saw this as a real threat, in part because of a meeting with the President in the early months of 2020, at which one of Trump’s advisers raised the prospect of taking military action to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons if Trump were to lose the election. At another meeting, at which Trump was not present, some of the President’s foreign-policy advisers again pushed military action against Iran. Milley later said that, when he asked why they were so intent on attacking Iran, Vice-President Mike Pence replied, “Because they are evil.”

In the months after the election, with Trump seemingly willing to do anything to stay in power, the subject of Iran was repeatedly raised in White House meetings with the President, and Milley repeatedly argued against a strike. Trump did not want a war, the chairman believed, but he kept pushing for a missile strike in response to various provocations against U.S. interests in the region. Milley, by statute the senior military adviser to the President, was worried that Trump might set in motion a full-scale conflict that was not justified. Trump had a circle of Iran hawks around him and was close with the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who was also urging the Administration to act against Iran after it was clear that Trump had lost the election. “If you do this, you’re gonna have a fucking war,” Milley would say.

Finally, on January 3rd, after Trump had flown back from his Christmas vacation at Mar-a-Lago, he convened the Oval Office meeting on Iran, asking his advisers about recent reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency on Iran’s nuclear activities. Both Mike Pompeo and the national-security adviser, Robert O’Brien, told Trump that it was not possible to do anything militarily at that point. Their attitude was that it was “too late to hit them.” After Milley walked through the potential costs and consequences, Trump agreed. And that was that: after months of anxiety and uncertainty, the Iran fight was over.

At the very end of the meeting Trump brought up the forthcoming rally of his supporters on January 6th, asking Milley and the acting Defense Secretary, Christopher Miller, if they were prepared for what Trump had already promised, on Twitter, would be a “wild” protest. It was a short conversation, Milley later recalled to associates, no more than a couple of minutes at the end of an hour-long meeting. “It’s gonna be a big deal,” Milley heard Trump say. “You’re ready for that, right?” It was the last time the President would ever speak to his Joint Chiefs chairman.

Just three days later, on January 6th, a version of Milley’s nightmare scenario played out anyway: an attack on the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob seeking to stop Congress from ratifying Biden’s victory. Milley had not envisioned it, not exactly—his fears had been largely about street violence, involving running battles between pro-Trump thugs and left-wing opponents that Trump might use as a pretext for demanding martial law. This was the analogy to Germany in the nineteen-thirties that Milley had in mind. When January 6th happened, it wasn’t quite like that, of course. But Milley told others on that awful day that what they had dreaded had come to pass: Trump had his “Reichstag moment” after all.

Susan B. Glasser is a staff writer at The New Yorker, where she writes a weekly column on life in Washington. She co-wrote, with Peter Baker, “The Man Who Ran Washington.”
2021-07-19 12:16:58  

이름: 비밀번호:
내용
-->
[中央논평]"合法을 가장(假裝)한 獨裁": K독재의 등장인가
 Opinion : 최민우의 시선 K독재의 등장인가 중앙일보 입력 2021.08.27 00:24 문재인 대통령은 26일 청와대에서 'K+벤처' 행사를 열었다. 홍남기 경제부총리는 25일 “K-테스트베드가 우리 경..(2021-08-27)
김현철, 윤석열 지지 “불의한 정권 교체할 인물, YS 연상케 해”
[조선닷컴]“그가 아니었으면 도저히 불가능했던 일”
 김현철, 윤석열 지지 “불의한 정권 교체할 인물, YS 연상케 해” 노석조 기자 입력 2021.08.03 15:45 김영삼(YS) 전 대통령의 차남인 김현철 김영삼민주센터 상임이사가 3일 국민의힘 대선 주자..(2021-08-03)
천안함서 아버지 잃고, 암으로 엄마까지… 홀로 남은 16세
[조선닷컴]암 투병 숨겼던 엄마 - “주변에 폐 끼치고 싶지 않다”
 천안함서 아버지 잃고, 암으로 엄마까지… 홀로 남은 16세 암 투병 숨겼던 엄마 - “주변에 폐 끼치고 싶지 않다” 올해 초에야 천안함 함장에 “제 아들을 부탁드립니다” 김민기 기자 박정훈 인턴기자(서..(2021-07-23)
美 합참의장 마크 밀리, "트럼프, 선거 패배 후 이란 폭격 거론"
[수잔 글레이서(Susan B. Glasser)]
 “You’re Gonna Have a Fucking War”: Mark Milley’s Fight to Stop Trump from Striking Iran Inside the extraordinary final-days confl..(2021-07-19)
대한민국 대통령 후보의 뒤틀린 歷史觀
[천영우 한반도미래포럼 이사장]
 [朝鮮칼럼 The Column] 대한민국 대통령 후보의 뒤틀린 역사관 소련, 북에 우호적 공산정권 세운다는 치밀한 전략·목표 전체주의 압제 서막 열어 미국은 자유민주 정부 수립외엔 뚜렷한 목표·정책 없어..(2021-07-09)
[中央 社說]이재명의 위험한 인식이 촉발한 역사 논쟁
[중앙일보]
 [사설] 이재명의 위험한 인식이 촉발한 역사 논쟁 [중앙일보] 입력 2021.07.05 00:12| .더불어민주당의 대선 주자인 이재명 경기지사가 최근 “대한민국이 다른 나라의 정부 수립 단계와는 달라 ..(2021-07-05)
최재형의 정치실험--迷宮에 빠져들고 있다
[신지호] https://youtu.be/D2wES80Wnug
 1. 출마 명분 취약 - 윤석열과 차이: 윤 총장은 끊임없이 정권실세로부터 압박, 본인 징계처분까지 받아 - 초기 대권 의사 없다가 막판에 생존 차원에서 결심 - 윤 대안론은 윤석열이 선두주자로 있는 ..(2021-06-28)
윤석열의 천안함 모자
[조선닷컴]
 윤석열의 천안함 모자 오는 29일 대선 출마 선언을 할 것이라고 밝힌 윤석열 전 검찰총장이 ‘천안함’ 모자를 쓰고 공원을 산책하는 장면이 포착됐다. 28일 <더팩트> 보도에 따르면 윤 전 총장은 지..(2021-06-28)
北인권·대만 언급한 한미 공동성명, 삐걱대던 양국 관계 가까워졌다
[조선닷컴]
 한미 공동성명에 대만 명시는 사실상 처음. 주희연 기자 워싱턴=공동취재단 입력 2021.05.22 11:41 | 수정 2021.05.22 11:42 21일(현지 시각) 채택된 한미 정상회담 공동성명엔 중국이 반..(2021-05-23)
[한반도24시] 美中 충돌 격화, 한국의 선택은
[홍관희]
 입력2021-04-04 17:39:40 수정 2021.04.04 17:39:40   홍관희 전 고려대 교수 美中 갈등에 주변국가 가담은 불가피 패권전쟁선 중간지대 보호 못받아 한미일 협력없인 북핵에 속..(2021-04-06)
[한반도24시]美혼란 틈새 노린 북한의 첨단核 협박
[홍관희]
 홍관희 (전 고려대 교수) 지난주 워싱턴에선 도널드 트럼프 대통령을 지지하는 폭도들이 의회 의사당에 난입해 의정(議政)을 마비시키는 사태가 발생했다. 급기야 트럼프 대통령이 ‘반란(insurrection)’을 ..(2021-01-17)
[한반도24시] 중국의 ‘한반도 야망’ 드러내는 반미 선동
[홍관희]
 입력2020-12-13 17:58:02 수정 2020.12.13 17:58:02   홍관희 전 고려대 교수 中, 美 권력 교체기 혼돈 이용 유달리 한국의 자주·독립 강조 세계 패권 위해 북한도 방패로 건..(2020-12-13)
[한반도 24시]'자유.인권.동맹' 다시 세울 바이든 승리
[홍관희]
 입력2020-11-08 15:23:27 수정 2020.11.08 16:58:08   美, 국제사회 리더로 복귀 눈앞 북·중·러 압박기조도 강화될 듯 혈맹 강조 바이든 집권은 호기 쿼드 동참 등 동맹 굳건..(2020-11-08)
[송평인 칼럼]개혁 아니라 혁명, 그것도 사악한 혁명
"한국 민주주의 위협..친문 세력의 軟性 레닌주의"
 송평인 논설위원  입력 2020-11-04 03:00수정 2020-11-04 03:00 민주주의 얼마든지 후퇴할 수 있어… 트럼프 파시즘에 미국도 위협받아 한국에서 민주주의 위협하는 건 친문 세력의..(2020-11-08)
2020 韓美 SCM 회의 이후 韓美동맹 정세
[신인균 자주국방네트워크 대표]
 주한 미 지상군 전투부대 철수, 내년 6월이 고비 [웨펀] 신인균 자주국방네트워크 대표 입력 2020-10-17 09:12수정 2020-10-17 14:50 동맹(Alliance)의 사전적 정의는 둘 이상..(2020-10-17)
北 당창건 75주, ICBM 공개- 美 "북한에 실망…완전한 비핵화 협상 참여해야"
[뉴스분석]
 2020.10.10. 오후 11:28   북한이 10일 노동당 창건 75주년을 맞아 열병식을 개최하고 신형 ICBM 추정 무기를 공개했다.아울러 김정은 북한 국무위원장이 육성연설을 했다고 조선중앙T..(2020-10-10)
[한반도24시] 안보 위협할 ‘10월 서프라이즈’ 나올까
[홍관희]
 [한반도24시] 안보 위협할 ‘10월 서프라이즈’ 나올까 입력2020-10-04 17:35:42 수정 2020.10.04 17:35:41   文정부 '공무원 피격 사건'에도 '평화'만 외치며 北폭정과 야..(2020-10-04)
[한반도 24시]마르크스의 망령이 맴도는 한반도
[홍관희]
 홍관희 (전 고려대 북한학과 교수) “하나의 유령, 공산주의 유령이 유럽을 배회하고 있다.” 1848년 칼 마르크스와 프리드리히 엥겔스가 공산당 선언에서 한 말이다. 그들이 창시한 공산주의가 서서히 태..(2020-08-30)
진중권, 反文 횃불을 쏘아 올리다..!!
[뉴스종합]
 진중권 논객이 문재인을 향해 직격탄을 날렸다.. 지금까지 일어나 온 문 정권의 좌파독재-위선의 배후이자 장본인이 문재인이라고 지목한 것이다.. 그는 이 시대 살아있는 양심이다.. 이제 문 정권이 붕괴 초읽..(2020-08-09)
[한반도 24시]국가 정체성 상실이 現 위기의 본질이다
[홍관희]
 국가 정체성 상실이 현 위기의 본질이다 홍관희 (전 고려대 북한학과 교수) ‘정체성(正體性)’의 사전적 의미는 ‘본래 가진 참모습’이다. 하나의 국가로서 대한민국의 정체성은 대한민국을 대한민국답게 ..(2020-07-19)

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  > 마지막

[김순덕 칼럼]그래도 우리나라엔 司法 正義가 살.. [김순덕 칼럼]그래도 우리나라엔 사법정의가 살.. (07.23)
前정치학회장 심지연, 이재명 ‘美점령군’ 반박 “광복 당시 일본군 34만명, 그들에겐 미군이 .. (07.06)
최장집 "민주화 세력, 현대사를 정의롭지 못한 .. [중앙일보] 입력 2021.07.05 00:02 수정.. (07.05)
[전문] 윤석열 출사표 “文정권 국.. (06.30)
[최보식이 만난 사람: 민경우 前 범.. (03.30)
태영호 "지금은 구한말… 한미동맹-한.. (03.14)
尹錫悅 검찰총장은 다음 大統領이 되.. (01.28)
[양평촌놈] 올해 농민들 작년보다 벼생산.. 09.27
[진정한승리] 지금 국민상생재난지원금이 집.. 09.16
[북한 지령받고 ..] 호랑이 꼬리 밟지 마라 09.14
[양평촌놈] 오늘 여의도 순복음교회 조용.. 09.14
[북괴 순항 미사..] 미국 이제 시작 하자 09.13


인생은 무거운 짐을 지고 먼길을 가는 것과 ..

Copyright  2010 freedomunion.net  All rights reserved   E-Mail:freedemocracy@hanmail.net
주소: 서울 중구 충무로 4가 12-1 일진페이퍼 빌딩 203호  TEL: (02) 2266-0168, 2261-2225  FAX: (02) 2266-017